Back to News
USPublished: 29 October 2026

[Regulatory Update] EPA Publishes Proposed Additional Reconsideration of Oil and Natural Gas Emission Standards (OOOOb/c)

Source:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) / Federal Register
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on October 27, 2026 a proposed additional reconsideration of its March 2024 final rule for the oil and natural gas sector—the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) in Subpart OOOOb and the Emission Guidelines (EG) in Subpart OOOOc—and published it in the Federal Register (91 FR 68234) as a proposed rule on October 29. The docket number is EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-0163, and comments are due December 16, 2026. According to EPA, it will hold a virtual public hearing on November 16. This is a proposal, not a final rule. Until any amendments are finalized, the baseline for operators' obligations remains the March 2024 final rule, as subsequently amended and extended. The proposal has four main elements. First, it would repeal the Super Emitter Program, under which third parties certified by EPA notify EPA of large emission events, from NSPS OOOO, OOOOa and OOOOb and from EG OOOOc. Second, it would create well-site subcategories. Two alternative approaches are proposed—by production level (marginal and non-marginal wells) or by resource type (conventional and unconventional wells)—and neither has been selected. A marginal well is one that produced 15 barrels of oil equivalent per day or less over the prior 12 months, and the proposal would relax the inspection, process controller and other requirements for marginal wells (or, under the alternative approach, for conventional wells). Third, for associated gas from wells producing primarily oil, EPA proposes to replace routing to a sales line as the best system of emission reduction (BSER) with routing to a control device or flare that achieves a reduction of 95 percent or more. Fourth, it would split the "no identifiable emissions" requirement for covers and closed vent systems into design and operational requirements. Repairs would generally be due within 24 hours of detection; where that is not possible, an initial repair attempt within 5 days and final repair within 30 days (unless the delay-of-repair conditions are met) would be required. A repair that takes longer than 24 hours would be treated as a deviation from the design requirement, which EPA states is not automatically a violation. The proposal also adds recordkeeping and reporting for repairs and resurveys, and an investigative analysis when emissions are detected from the same system for the third time in a year. EPA's regulatory impact analysis (RIA) estimates the increase in economic surplus from the proposal over 2027–2050 at about USD 45 billion in present value at a 3 percent discount rate (about USD 32 billion at 7 percent; 2024 dollars, discounted to 2025). Economic surplus aggregates compliance cost reductions and other effects, so this figure is an estimate and not a simple reduction in compliance costs. The same RIA projects that methane emissions over the same period would be about 60 million short tons higher than under a baseline that includes the 2024 final rule and related actions (VOC about 17 million and hazardous air pollutants about 2.3 million short tons). These are modeled estimates, not measured values, and EPA states that parts of its analysis may overestimate the forgone emission reductions.
Editor's View

Until any proposal is finalized, the baseline for operators' obligations is the March 2024 final rule as subsequently amended and extended. Under the current rules, the compliance date for the zero-emission standard for process controllers (NSPS), the deadline for state plan submittal, and the implementation date of the Super Emitter Program are all set at January 22, 2027. NSPS OOOOb applies directly to facilities that began construction, reconstruction or modification after December 6, 2022, whereas EG OOOOc is a framework in which states prepare plans, so the standards that apply to existing facilities are determined by state plans. EPA states that the presumptive standards are the starting point for state plans and that states may take into account factors such as a facility's remaining useful life. The proposal could change inspection and equipment requirements by well-site category, the handling of associated gas, and the response to super-emitter notifications; because two approaches to well-site categories are proposed, which one is adopted will not be known until the final rule. At the same time, the proposal also includes additions, such as repair deadlines and recordkeeping for covers and closed vent systems. The sources for this article contain no information on impacts on Japanese companies or on market prices.

※ This article is based on official public information from an external source (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) / Federal Register) and has been analyzed and organized for practical use.
Advertisement